Legal Opinion
Harris v. City of Memphis, Tenn.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided September 29, 2000No. 3:99CV00425 SMRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REASONER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended and Substituted Complaint (Docket No. 13). Plaintiff has responded (Docket No. 15), and Defendant has replied (Docket No. 17). For the following reasons, the motion is granted and the case is dismissed. Any remaining motions in this case are moot.
I.Facts
The present action is a Arkansas common law negligence claim brought by Allye M. Harris (“Ms.Harris”), an Arkansas resident, against the City of Memphis for the alleged negligent maintenance of the Interstate 55 Tennessee/Arkansas Bridge…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cosmas v. HassettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Coleman v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ronald Hughes v. Wal-Mart StoresCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001
- Ronald Hughes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Vicki L. Mobley v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019