Legal Opinion

Borough of Swarthmore v. Public Service Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1922No. Appeal, No. 23PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

In 1900 the Borough of Swarthmore consented to the occupation of Yale Avenue with a street railway, upon condition, inter alia, that the railway company “keep in good order both the roadway of Yale Avenue for its full width from curb line to curb line, and also the bridges, flagstones, drains and gutters along said route. ......” The borough was constitutionally authorized to impose the condition: Scranton v. P. S. C., 268 Pa. 192, 194. In 1906 the grantee of the franchise was merged into another company, that then leased its property and franchises to the Philadelphia…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Citizens Passenger Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. City of Scranton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Collingdale Boro. v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Ben Avon Borough v. Ohio Valley Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CooperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Swarthmore Borough v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Norristown v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Swarthmore Boro. v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API