Norristown v. Reading Transit & Light Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Sadler,
The Borough of Norristown, in 1884, by ordinance gave a passenger railway permission to occupy certain of its highways, upon condition that the latter should repair and renew, when necessary, the streets on which the line was proposed to be built, and the grant was duly accepted and the tracks laid. Some years thereafter, the motive power in use was changed to electricity, and, in the franchise so providing, a like stipulation appeared. A lease to a traction company followed, by which the contract liabilities of the original grantee were assumed, and, in 1913, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Citizens Passenger Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- City of Scranton v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Swarthmore Borough v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Fogelsville & Trexlertown Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tide Water Pipe Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Philadelphia v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- West Penn Railways Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Bank of Pittsburgh v. Purcell Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.