Legal Opinion

Studeman v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 1952No. 35,928Published

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

In this matter, the district court of Meeker county refused to change the venue of an action to Scott county, as requested by defendant (relator), and this application is made for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel such transfer.

The question raised by defendant is whether the venue of an action to restrain her from proceeding further with the cancellation *31of a contract for sale of real estate is transitory and to be tried in the county of defendant’s residence, or whether it is local and to be tried in the county in which the land is located.

Defendant is, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nyquist v. District Court of Swift CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. State ex rel. Weld v. District Court of Blue Earth CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. State ex rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. State Ex Rel. Schmitt v. HoffmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Quinn v. Butler BrothersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API