Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Grinnell v. Reece

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2013No. 2012-1720PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint of appellant, Timothy Grinnell, for writs of mandamus and procedendo to compel appellee, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Judge Guy L. Reece II, to resentence him by issuing a judgment of conviction and sentence that complies with Crim.R. 32(C).

Timothy Grinnell, pro se. Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and A. Paul Theis, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

{¶ 2} “Neither mandamus nor procedendo will lie to compel an act that has already been performed.” State ex rel. Lester v. Pepple,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rose v. McGintyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State ex rel. Lester v. PeppleOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State ex rel. Culgan v. KimblerOhio Supreme Court · 2012

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. TayseOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Grinnell v. Bowen (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  4. State ex rel. Grinnell v. ReeceOhio Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API