Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rose v. McGinty

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2011No. 2010-2008PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying a writ of procedendo to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Timothy J. McGinty, to enter a new judgment of conviction and sentence for appellant, Floyd Rose, in State v. Rose, Cuyahoga Cty. C.P. case No. CR-07-492008-B, that complies with the requirements of Crim.R. 32(C) and R.C. 2505.02.

{¶ 2} “A writ of procedendo will not issue to compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed.” State ex rel. Sevayega v. McMonagle, 122 Ohio St.3d 54, 2009-Ohio-2367, 907 N.E.2d 1180, ¶ 1; State ex rel.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State Ex Rel. Davis v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Davis v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State ex rel. Sevayega v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Rose v. McGintyOhio Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. Craig (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. Jackson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. CutrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State ex rel. Nickleson v. MayberryOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API