State ex rel. Rose v. McGinty
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying a writ of procedendo to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Timothy J. McGinty, to enter a new judgment of conviction and sentence for appellant, Floyd Rose, in State v. Rose, Cuyahoga Cty. C.P. case No. CR-07-492008-B, that complies with the requirements of Crim.R. 32(C) and R.C. 2505.02.
{¶ 2} “A writ of procedendo will not issue to compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed.” State ex rel. Sevayega v. McMonagle, 122 Ohio St.3d 54, 2009-Ohio-2367, 907 N.E.2d 1180, ¶ 1; State ex rel.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. Davis v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. Sevayega v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Rose v. McGintyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. Craig (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. Jackson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. CutrightOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State ex rel. Nickleson v. MayberryOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.