Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1988No. F-86-56Published

1DissentParks, Judge

I respectfully dissent to the majority’s holding that “it is settled law that duress is not a defense to escape in this jurisdiction.” Majority, at 110. In the most recent case cited by the majority, this Court expressly held that “although a duress instruction might be appropriate in a proper fact situation, the facts of the instant case did not merit one.” Grider v. State, 737 P.2d 1227, 1228 (Okla.Crim.App.1987).

The defense of duress is recognized in three Oklahoma statutes. See 21 O.S.1981, §§ 152(7), 155, 156. “[T]he statutory language places no restriction on the kinds of crimes for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Shannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  4. Broaddrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Chester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API