Legal Opinion

Coline Oil Co. v. Cannon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 21, 1930No. 18321PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEB. C.

In our consideration of this cause, we will refer to the defendants in error, Hal M. Cannon, trustee of the estate ■of J. S. Mullen, bankrupt, and W. M. Bonner, plaintiff and intervener, respectively, in the trial court, as plaintiffs, and plaintiff in error, the Coline Oil Company, as defendant, or by name, as the case may be. The cause was one to quiet the title to certain lands of the bankrupt estate acquired by Bonner, against an oil and gas lease thereon held by defendant.

Clarity of the matters for our decision first requires our references to the transactions giving rise to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hill v. RenoIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Anthis v. Sullivan Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Roach v. Junction Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Curtis v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. First National Bank of Healdton v. DunlapSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paris Bank of Texas v. CusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Allred v. Royalty Owners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Illinois Bankers Life Assurance Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Jones v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. MILLS v. FUHRMANNCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API