Legal Opinion
Carney v. State of Washington
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 29, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00415Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 MARY M. CARNEY, CASE NO. C21-415 MJP 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND 12 v. 13 STATE OF WASHINGTON; WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND 14 RECREATION COMMISSION; and SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL 15 COMMUNITY, 16 Defendants. 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand. (Dkt. No. 21.) Having considered the 18 motion and all related papers, (Dkt. Nos. 1, 21, 22, 32, 33, 34), the Court finds that it has subject- 19 matter jurisdiction over this proceeding and DENIES the motion to remand. 20…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.