Legal Opinion
(PC) Argel v. Godwin
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 21, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00597Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN WILLIAM ARGEL, Case No. 1:21-cv-00597-NONE-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 13 v. (ECF No. 18) 14 GODWIN, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR 15 Defendants. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. Nos. 15, 19) 16 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 I. Background 19 Plaintiff John William Argel (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 20 forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 On…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.