Legal Opinion

Wattles v. Agelastos

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 1970No. Docket 8,381PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

Plaintiff, ancillary administrator of the estate of Elizabeth Vassel, was granted summary judgment below on a claim arising out of a promissory note. Defendants appeal as of right.

In 1964, defendants purchased a restaurant business from plaintiff’s decedent. The purchase price was $30,000; defendants paid $8,300 in cash, executed a-promissory note for the balance and gave a security interest in the restaurant and fixtures.

The note promised payments of $250 per month. We can establish from the record that defendants defaulted on the note some time in 1966 when the unpaid balance was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buckman v. Hill Military AcademyOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ceabuske v. SmolarzMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hasman v. CanmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Earhart v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. CreasySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Gillespie v. DeWittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. CreasySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Carnegie Bank v. ShalleckNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  5. Northwest Bank & Trust Co. v. GutshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API