Legal Opinion

Ceabuske v. Smolarz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1924No. Docket No. 32PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiff sold his retail grocery and meat stock and business, together with the tools and store fixtures, to defendants on a title retaining contract. For the balance of the purchase price plaintiff accepted defendants’ note for $2,500. Defendants ran the business for a time and then sold it, with plaintiff’s consent, to one Schadel. Schadel gave plaintiff his note for $2,500, and later gave a chattel mortgage on the stock to secure it, but plaintiff did not surrender defendants’ note. Schadel was not successful. He was soon in bankruptcy. Failing to receive his pay from Schadel, plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gillett v. IvoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Imperial Hotels Corporation v. Arthur P. Dore Jay Ambe Corporation and Dore Development Company, Mainstream Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. Fender v. FeighnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Wattles v. AgelastosMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Bigelow v. MacCroneMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bernard E. Pincus and Max J. Pincus v. The Outlet CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API