Legal Opinion

State v. Tipton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 2010No. SD 29820PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Chief Judge.

Darrell Tipton seeks plain error review 1 of his double jeopardy challenge to two of five convictions he received in a jury trial. We affirm the judgment and convictions because plain error relief is inappropriate.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not at issue, and Tipton’s sole point is a narrow one, so we decline to detail the sometimes grisly trial evidence. Suffice it to say that Tipton, a drifter from Tennessee, was living temporarily in a small backyard shed in Springfield. He had become acquainted with a woman whose badly decomposed body was discovered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. MullenixMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State v. TylerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. BarrinerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garvester Bracken, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. ShinkleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State of Missouri v. Brian K. HeathcockSupreme Court of Missouri · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API