State v. Tipton
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL E. SCOTT, Chief Judge.
Darrell Tipton seeks plain error review 1 of his double jeopardy challenge to two of five convictions he received in a jury trial. We affirm the judgment and convictions because plain error relief is inappropriate.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not at issue, and Tipton’s sole point is a narrow one, so we decline to detail the sometimes grisly trial evidence. Suffice it to say that Tipton, a drifter from Tennessee, was living temporarily in a small backyard shed in Springfield. He had become acquainted with a woman whose badly decomposed body was discovered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. CampbellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. MullenixMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. TylerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. BarrinerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garvester Bracken, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. ShinkleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- State of Missouri v. Brian K. HeathcockSupreme Court of Missouri · 2025