Legal Opinion

Garvester Bracken, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 2015No. ED101059PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Hess, Judge

Introduction

Garvester Bracken (Movant) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing following his convictions for attempted deviate sexual assault, forcible rape, and two counts of second-degree domestic assault. Movant claims the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion for post-conviction relief because his trial counsel was ineffective for: (1) failing to object to cross-examination testimony that Movant was abusive towards his former spouse; and (2) failing to challenge his domestic assault convictions on the basis of double…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  4. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. State v. ClaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nigro v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Johnson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Boston v. RameyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
  4. Cannon v. PayneDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
  5. Christopher L. Russell, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API