Legal Opinion
In re the Claims of Sadallah
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 5, 1976PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHerlihy, J.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 30, 1975, which adopted and affirmed a Referee’s decision sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimants eligible for benefits upon the expiration of the seven-week suspension period applicable to labor controversies pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 592 of the Labor Law.
In considering a companion case of Matter of Kingston (KLM Royal Dutch Airlines-Levine) (46 AD2d 949) this court noted that the instant case was not then properly before us and the attempted appeal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hawaiian Telephone Co. v. State of Hawaii Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1976
- In re the Claim of HeitzenraterNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Matter of George (Catherwood)New York Court of Appeals · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MEMCO v. Maryland Employment Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977