Legal Opinion

Simkin v. Heil Valley Ranch, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1988No. 85CA1511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Roane Simkin (Simkin) appeals a partial summary judgment holding that a certain release, if it were found to have been executed by her, would exculpate Heil Valley Ranch, Inc., (Ranch) from liability to her based on her fall from a horse. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Simkin filed a personal injury action which alleged that Ranch’s negligence and breach of warranty caused injuries to her when she fell from a horse provided by Ranch. The trial court entered a partial summary judgment in favor of Ranch based on a release or exculpatory agreement which it concluded…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gross v. SweetNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Jones v. DresselSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Calarco v. YMCA of Greater Metropolitan ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Loup-Miller v. Brauer & Assoc.-Rocky MountainColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Geise v. County of NiagaraNew York Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heil Valley Ranch, Inc. v. SimkinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Anderson v. EbyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. Anderson v. EbyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Heil Valley Ranch, Inc. v. SimkinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  5. Heil Valley Ranch, Inc. v. SimkinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API