Legal Opinion
Ploetz v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
A number of questions are discussed by the plaintiffs in support of the judgment of the circuit court. We shall find it necessary to consider but one of *605these. Sec. 102.07, Statutes of 1925, provides in part as follows:
“The term ‘employee’ as used in sections 102.01 to 102.34, inclusive [workmen’s compensation act], shall be construed to mean: . . .
“(4) Every person in the service of another under any contract of hire, express or implied, oral or written, including aliens, all helpers and assistants of employees, whether paid by the employers or employee, if employed with the knowledge,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holmen Creamery Ass'n v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- F. C. Gross & Bros. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vandervort v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Metzger v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931