Legal Opinion

United States v. New Departure Mfg. Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 12, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Indictment against the New Departure Manufacturing Company and others for alleged violation of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act (Act July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3200]).

1Opinion of the Court

HAZRT,, District Judge.

The defendants, the New Departure Manufacturing Company and 5 other corporations and 18 individuals, have been indicted in eight counts for the violation of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, passed July 2, 1890 (Act July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 vStat. 209 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3200]), being charged with unlawfully engaging in a conspiracy in restraint of interstate trade and commerce among the several states and foreign nations, and with attempting to monopolize such interstate trade and commerce.

The indictment, to which the defendants have demurred, after…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. Johns-Manville CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. United States v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API