Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jokelson v. Allied Stores Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1968Published

1Dissent

McGivern, J. (dissenting).

If the majority is correct in its analysis, there should be no new trial. The entire complaint should be dismissed. In effect that is the result achieved by the majority’s disposition, either substantively or by procedural impediment, notwithstanding a jury verdict in the plaintiff’s favor.

But, in my view, the majority has not properly conceived one of the basic premises of the plaintiff’s case, i.e., overcrowding. I feel the plaintiff made out a case of negligence prima facie on this score and the Trial Judge did not err in submitting the case to the jury. In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shannahan v. . Empire Engineering Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Bennett v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Lee v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  4. Gardner v. FriederichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. Abravanel v. Ohrbach's Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API