Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Omaha v. Three Dimension Systems Products, Inc.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided January 29, 2001No. 8:98CV569Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

BATAILLON, District Judge.

I have before me 3D’s oral motions for judgment as a matter of law made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 which I took under advisement at the close of the two-week jury trial in this case. See Filing No. 344. I also have before me the motion (Filing No. 350) of First National Bank of Omaha (FNBO) made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to amend judgment, which is supported by a brief and an index of evidence (Filing No. 351). Finally, I have before me FNBO’s motion (Filing No. 352) made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
Irwin v. MurpheyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
Stockmen's Livestock Market, Inc. v. Norwest Bank of Sioux City, Na, Stockmen's Livestock Market, Inc. v. Norwest Bank of Sioux City, NaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
Oldenburger v. Del E. Webb Development Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.