Nall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
I SULLIVAN, Judge.
The issue presented by this writ application is whether the occupants of a vehicle owned by a resident relative may recover under an additional uninsured motorist (UM) policy that they purchased on a vehi*1081cle not involved in the accident. Because we find that La.R.S. 22:1406(D)(l)(e) prohibits recovery under a second policy in these circumstances, we hold that the trial court erred in not granting the UM insurer’s motion for summary judgment on this issue.
Facts
On December 25, 1999, Herman Nall was operating a vehicle owned by his mother-in-law, Margie Coker, with Ms. Coker…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Roger v. Estate of MoultonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Clavier v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Nall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005