Legal Opinion

Fortune v. Wong

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1985No. 9838, 9900, 10017, 9942, 10020, 9969 and 9954PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

NAKAMURA, J.

Seven appeals have been consolidated for consideration; they stem from a personal injury action and attempts by the plaintiff to recover the awarded damages from an insurance company. The principal parties to the appeals are the plaintiff, whose minor son was injured when struck by a motor vehicle driven by another minor, and the insurance carrier that issued a homeowner’s insurance policy to the driver’s parents. Though the parties raise a host of questions, the dispositive one is whether the policy insured the driver and his parents against liability for…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. SandbulteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Sturla, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Herzog v. National American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. U. S. Fire Insurance Co. v. ColverAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Safeco Insurance v. GilstrapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co. v. Financial Security InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FermahinHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. OntiverosHawaii Supreme Court · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API