Legal Opinion · Dissent

Diefendorf v. City of Peoria

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 3, 1999No. 3-98-0662Published

1DissentJustice Breslin

The majority holds that bicyclists generally are not intended users of sidewalks and thus are not owed a duty of care. I respectfully disagree with this conclusion for two reasons: (1) the majority’s decision heavily relies on Boub v. Township of Wayne (183 Ill. 2d 520, 702 N.E.2d 535 (1998)), a factually distinguishable case, while ignoring other cases more clearly on point; and (2) the majority reads foreseeability out of the Act.

In the last several years there have only been three published appellate court decisions that encompass the factual situation and issue presented by this case:…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boub v. Township of WayneIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Larson v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Prokes v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Muallem v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Lipper v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API