Prokes v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan
The defendant, the City of Chicago, brought this interlocutory appeal under Supreme Court Rule 308 (107 Ill. 2d R. 308). The trial court certified the following questions for review by this court:
“1. Does the City owe a duty to maintain its property under Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 85, par. 3 — 102(a), where the use of the property is an intended and permitted use, but where the user is an unintended and unpermitted user.
2. Specifically, does the City owe a duty to an adult riding a bicycle on a sidewalk where under City ordinance, bicycle riding on sidewalks is permitted and intended by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Larson v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
3Cited by17 opinions
- Torres v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Hanover Ins. Co. v. BOARD OF EDUC., CITY OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Ramirez v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Montano v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Lipper v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.