Legal Opinion

Prokes v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 11, 1991No. 1-89-3370PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan

The defendant, the City of Chicago, brought this interlocutory appeal under Supreme Court Rule 308 (107 Ill. 2d R. 308). The trial court certified the following questions for review by this court:

“1. Does the City owe a duty to maintain its property under Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 85, par. 3 — 102(a), where the use of the property is an intended and permitted use, but where the user is an unintended and unpermitted user.

2. Specifically, does the City owe a duty to an adult riding a bicycle on a sidewalk where under City ordinance, bicycle riding on sidewalks is permitted and intended by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Larson v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Torres v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Hanover Ins. Co. v. BOARD OF EDUC., CITY OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Ramirez v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Montano v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Lipper v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API