Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 11, 1996No. 990-96, 991-96PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury convicted Appellant of incest, indecency with a child, and aggravated sexual assault. The trial court assessed his punishment at confinement for 25 years, 25 years, and 45 years, respectively. This conviction was affirmed. Dixon v. State, 923 S.W.2d 161 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth, 1996). Appellant’s petition for discretionary review challenges the Court of Appeals’ holding that Appellant failed to preserve error in his complaint that the State improperly impeached a defense witness with pending felony charges.

Appellant called Elmer…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lankston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Zillender v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996

4Cited by38 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Lajoie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Maldonado v. ThalerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  4. Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API