Dixon v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Per curiam
A jury convicted Appellant of incest, indecency with a child, and aggravated sexual assault. The trial court assessed his punishment at confinement for 25 years, 25 years, and 45 years, respectively. This conviction was affirmed. Dixon v. State, 923 S.W.2d 161 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth, 1996). Appellant’s petition for discretionary review challenges the Court of Appeals’ holding that Appellant failed to preserve error in his complaint that the State improperly impeached a defense witness with pending felony charges.
Appellant called Elmer…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Lankston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Zillender v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
4Cited by38 opinions
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Lajoie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Maldonado v. ThalerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.