Legal Opinion

Keck v. Wingert

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1933No. Docket No. 7754PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Action by plaintiff to recover from defendants an alleged secret commission claimed to have been obtained by them in acting as agents for plaintiff in the leasing of certain prospective oil lands. From a judgment rendered against them defendants have appealed.

The contentions of appellants are many, but we think the material ones may well be summed up and considered as a claim that the findings are not supported by the evidence.

The findings state in substance that plaintiff was the owner of certain lands adjacent to the Santa Fe Springs oil-field; that defendant Wingert…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Russell v. ScofieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Von Dorn v. CraryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trotta v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Stevenson v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Lipschultz v. Gregory Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API