Legal Opinion
Colonial Penn Insurance v. Curry
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Allan L. Winick, J.
Petitioner Colonial Penn Insurance Company moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 7503 (b) permanently staying an uninsured motorist arbitration demanded by James Curry, the respondent. A hearing was directed by a Justice of this court (Hart, J., Feb. 2, 1993) and after the hearing held on March 4, 1993, the court makes the following determination:
On August 10, 1990 respondent James Curry, with Steve Carey and two girls, came to the Assumption Church parking lot in Centereach, New York in an automobile. Upon arrival, they saw Robert Lovisio, another friend.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sperling v. Great American Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Byrne v. BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Rice v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949
- Wills v. Investors Bankstocks Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993