Legal Opinion
Nettles v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided February 10, 2005No. 2:00-cv-00223PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
STARRETT, District Judge.
This case is before the court on separate Motions for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(b) and (c) by Defendants Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The court, having reviewed the motions, briefs, pleadings and exhibits on file as well as applicable law and being thus fully advised in the premises, finds that the Motions for Summary Judgment filed by the defendants are well taken and should be granted. The court further finds more specifically…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Topalian v. EhrmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Alex John, Jr. v. State of Louisiana (Board of Trustees for State Colleges and Universities)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Municipal Bond Reporting Antitrust Litigation. Munitrad Systems, Inc. v. Standard and Poor's CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Montgomery v. CitiMortgage, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2013
- Fife v. Vicksburg Healthcare, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2013