Sandlin v. State

The defendant objected to being put upon trial because the evidence in his case would be the same as that in a case just tried in the same court on which the jury was then deliberating, and because the jurors to try his case had heard the testimony in the former case. There was no taerit iñ this objection. Moreover, no exception was reserved to the action of the court in overruling the objection.

The statement made by the defendant at the time of the arrest was in the nature of a confession and, the proper predicate being proven, was admissible in evidence.

Immediately after defendant was…