Legal Opinion

Byers v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1929No. 7 Div. 496PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

Motion was made by defendant for a continuance of his case on the ground that jurors from which he was to select a jury were present in court and heard the testimony in the case of State v. Caldwell, in which Caldwell was being tried for the unlawful possession of the still here involved. Upon examination it was ascertained that four of the jurors on the regular panel were present and heard the testimony in the Caldwell Case, but they each said that they had not formed or expressed an opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant. The granting of a continuance under these facts was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Cline v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Sanders v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Shouse v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Gray v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Smiley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. Clayton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API