Palmer v. Roginsky
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by Archibald Palmer, trustee in bankruptcy of Pincus Roginsky, against Abraham Roginsky and another. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, District Judge.
This case raises the question of the jurisdiction of this court, regardless of the defendant’s consent, over a suit by a trustee in bankruptcy against a fraudulent transferee of property of the bankrupt, when the right depends upon the state law, and not the act of 1898 (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 544 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3418]). The amendments of .1903 (Act Feb. 5, 1903, c. 487, 32 Stat. 797 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1909, p. 1308]), as they passed the House of Representatives, gave jurisdiction in the case of transfers fraudulent under either the act of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gregory v. AtkinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1904
- Hull v. BurrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1907
- American China Development Co. v. BoydDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1906
- Skewis v. BarthellDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rathman v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Sheppard v. LincolnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
- Parker v. ShermanDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1912