Legal Opinion

Wasmuth-Endicott Co. v. Karst

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1922No. 11,135PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceedings for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Clarence N. Karst against the Wasmuth-Endicott Company. From an award for applicant, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, P. J.

This is an appeal from an award by the Industrial Board in favor of appellee. No question is made as to the sufficiency of the facts to sustain the award, but the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of facts is challenged. The following is a statement of so much of the finding of Tacts as is material to a determination of the question presented by this appeal: “The full Board * * * finds that ofi the 9th day of February, 1920, plaintiff was in the employment of the defendant at an average weekly wage of *281$19.29; that on said date he received a personal injury by accident arising…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Larke v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  3. Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Haskell & Barker Car Co. v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Indian Creek Coal & Mining Co. v. CalvertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Burlington Mills Corp. v. HagoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  2. Meyer v. RoetteleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Prater v. Indiana Briquetting Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State Ex Rel. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Buchanan v. Maryland Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API