Pico Citizens Bank v. Tafco Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PATROSSO, J. pro tem. *
This action in replevin was instituted by the plaintiff as assignee of H. 0. Moos doing business as Moos Manufacturing Company, to recover possession of a quantity of knife and scissor sharpeners or their value in ease possession thereof could not be had. Following the filing of the complaint and prior to trial, plaintiff invoked the auxiliary remedy of claim and delivery and thereby secured possession of a number but not all of said items claimed by it. By the trial court’s judgment, plaintiff’s right to the sharpeners of which it had obtained possession was confirmed,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Hyatt v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Sanborn v. BallanfonteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. United States AircoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. Surety Bond Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Gray1 CPB, LLC v. KolokotronisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Hawkins v. YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Pico Citizens Bank v. Tafco Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.