Cronin v. Bechtel Power Corp.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CONABOY, District Judge.
This action is before this Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his intra-union remedies. Plaintiff admits that exhaustion is necessary before an employee is entitled to bring a suit under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, but avers that his situation comes within one of the narrow exceptions to that rule, that he need not attempt intra-union remedies because to do so would be futile, due to the Union’s breach of its duty of fair representation to him.
Plaintiff Timothy Cronin was employed at the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Donald Newgent v. Modine Manufacturing Company and United Auto Workers Local Union Number 530Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Leury v. UGI CORPORATIONDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- John Schultz v. Owens-Illinois Incorporated and District No. 9, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Aiello v. Apex Marine Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- John Schultz v. Owens-Illinois Incorporated and District No. 9, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Kierra Brown v. City Of OaklandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
- Thi Thu Hoai Tran v. Markwayne MullinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026