John Schultz v. Owens-Illinois Incorporated and District No. 9, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
In a prior appeal, this court held that plaintiffs could state a claim for relief under section 301(a) of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947 (the “LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (1976), for an alleged breach of the duty of fair representation by plaintiffs’ union, District No. 9 of the Machinists’ International Union (the “Union”).1 We also found that there was such a potential claim under section 301(a) against plaintiffs’ employer, Owens-Illinois, Inc. (“Owens”), based upon Owens’ alleged breach of contract involving rights in an apprenticeship program. Schultz v.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Robert Yeftich v. Navistar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Eduardo C. Bautista v. Pan American World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United Independent Flight Officers, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc., and Air Line Pilots Association, InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- H. Jack Frandsen v. Brotherhood Of Railway, Airline And Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express And Station EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Joseph D. Thomas v. United Parcel Service, Inc. And Local 710, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.