Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark Kiefer

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2014No. 13-50182PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NGUYEN, Circuit Judge:

Sentencing in child pornography cases can be controversial. 1 In this case, however, it is not. Mark Robert Kiefer was indicted and, pursuant to a plea agreement, pleaded guilty to one count of receiving child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252. Under the plea agreement, Kiefer reserved the right to appeal the constitutionality of § 2G2.2 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) and the five-year mandatory minimum sentence codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2252(b)(1). The district court sentenced Kiefer to sixty-three months imprisonment pursuant to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Douglas County v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. James Dale LittleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Albert Hernandez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. James Dale LittleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Javier UribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Jeffrey BardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API