United States v. Javier Uribe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Javier Uribe appeals the district court’s imposition of a 30-month sentence following his guilty plea to violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and we affirm.
1.Reviewing de novo, United States v. Kiefer, 760 F.3d 926, 929 (9th Cir.2014), we conclude that the district court did not err in calculating the applicable 18-24 month Guidelines range. The court properly increased Uribe’s offense level based on a 1991 aggravated felony conviction for receiving stolen property, despite the conviction’s age. See U.S.S.G. §…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Hugo Gutierrez-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.