State v. Gaddy
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
Defendant appeals the enhancement of his sentence as a habitual offender. The dispositive issue in the case is whether the district court had jurisdiction to determine defendant’s status as a repeat offender when the court made that determination only after defendant had completely served his underlying sentence. We reverse. FACTS
Defendant was convicted of a felony on July 5, 1985. On September 17, 1985, he was sentenced to three years in prison followed by two years of parole. Defendant was released from prison on September 17, 1987, and then was re-imprisoned for…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. MondragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- State v. ArandaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. TravarezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. HardestyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HardestyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. LaraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. FreedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. FreedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.