Legal Opinion
Alturas Indian Rancheria v. Newsom
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 28, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01486Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Alturas Indian Rancheria, No. 2:22-cv-01486-KJM-DMC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Gavin Newsom and the State of California, 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Alturas Indian Rancheria brings this action against defendants Governor Gavin 18 | Newsom and the State of California, challenging the State’s negotiating position with respect to a 19 | new tribal-state gaming compact. Alturas claims the State did not negotiate the compact in good 20 | faith as required by the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- In Re Indian Gaming Related Cases. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Elk Valley Rancheria Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Redding Rancheria Smith River Rancheria, and Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. The State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.