Legal Opinion

in Re Bath Junkie Franchise, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided February 7, 2008No. 09-07-00437-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-07-437 CV

NO. 09-07-395 CV

____________________

IN RE BATH JUNKIE FRANCHISE, INC.

and

BATH JUNKIE FRANCHISE, INC., Appellant

V

HYGIENE, L.L.C., CHERYL PINSON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND

DEBRA REDDEN, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellees

Original Proceeding

and

On Appeal from the 221st District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 06-08-07829 CV

OPINION

By way of petition for writ of mandamus and interlocutory appeal, Bath Junkie Franchise, Inc. ("Bath Junkie") seeks relief from the trial court's denial of its motion to compel…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API