Legal Opinion

Quigley & Manard, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 27, 1975No. Court Nos. 68/45406, etcPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

The issue in this case is whether certain merchandise imported from Canada and described in thé customs entry papers as television coils was properly classified by customs as inductors under TSUS item 682.60, dutiable at 15% ad valorem, or should be classified as contended by plaintiff as parts of television apparatus under TSÜS item 685.20, dutiable at 10% ad valorem.

*51This action involves ten protests consolidated for trial. The television coils described on the entry papers are identified by part numbers, this litigation being limited to part numbers 73B45-243, 73B53-251,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. E. Green & Son (New York), Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Herbert G. Schwarz, Dba Ski Imports v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Edo Commercial Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API