Legal Opinion

King v. Hill

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1941No. 7719PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Hickman

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This is an action of trespass to try title brought by plaintiffs in error, Hannibal King, et al, against defendants in error, Charles C. Hill, et al, the land involved being 44-1/3 acres out of the C. C. Marsh survey in Houston County. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of defendants in error and that judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 136 S. W. (2d) 632.

Defendants in error claim title under deed from H. G. Denby to' G. W. Mobley. Plaintiffs in error claim title, in part at least, under G.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rivers v. FooteTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Mann v. FalconTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  3. McSween v. YettTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Hannay v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  5. McKenzie Construction Co. v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Austin v. AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Eidson v. Perry National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. King v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Snyder v. Citizens State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  5. Eidson v. Perry National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API