Legal Opinion

McSween v. Yett

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1883No. Case No. 1470PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Lampasas. Tried below before the lion. W. A. Blackburn.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

Our Revised Statutes provide that, in an action of trespass to t^r title, the defendant may, under the plea of “ not guilty,” give in evidence any lawful defense except the statute of limitations, which shall be specially pleaded. Art. 4793. This is no more than a re-enactment of the law as it had previously existed by virtue of statutes and decisions of the supreme court interpreting them Rivers v. Foote, 11 Tex., 671; Hannay v. Thompson, 14 Tex., 142.

*184Under these previous enactments, the supreme court had held that if, in addition to the plea of “ not guilty,” a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shields v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Rivers v. FooteTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Hannay v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. CarrTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Rockhold v. Lucky Tiger Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Texas Creosoting Co. v. Hartburg Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Grundy v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Pierce v. Texas Rice Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API