Legal Opinion
Burr v. Kulas
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1997No. Civil 960384PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Joyce Burr appealed from the trial court’s summary judgment dismissing her action against Cheryl Kulas and Donald Lemon on the ground it was time barred. Burr contends the trial court erred in applying a three-year statute of limitations. She argues, under North Dakota’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO), N.D.C.C. Ch. 12.1-06.1, the trial court should not have applied a three-year statute of limitations. We agree and we reverse and remand for trial.
[¶ 2] In 1988, Burr was a graduate student at the University of North Dakota (UND) in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Paul Handeen v. Gregory A. Lemaire Henry Lemaire Patricia Lemaire, Orlins & Brainerd Law Firm Richard K. Brainerd Peter I. OrlinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Adolph M. Rotermund v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hurt v. FreelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Messiha v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Estate of Wenzel-Mosset Ex Rel. Gaukler v. NickelsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Kittleson v. Grynberg Petroleum CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. DuncanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.