Brockmeyer v. Sanitary District
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action of covenant. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jesse Holdom, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
appellee's counsel make the following objections to the
declaration does not allege that the main channel had been completed. This objection is based on the words in the deed, “ that said grantee, its successors and assigns shall provide and continuously maintain, from the time .when its main channel shall have been completed, such an outlet or drain from said ditch as will carry all the water from said ditch into said main channel.” Whether or not this objection is good as to the first and second counts, or either of them, it is unnecessary to decide; because, manifestly, it has no…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Conduitt v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Fitch v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi RailwayIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- Kuecken v. VoltzIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sexauer v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Bachman v. Colpaert Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935
- Grand Island Hotel Corp. v. Second Island Development Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Com'rs of Hwys. of Towns of Annawan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Alexander S. v. Arnold ConstableNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.