Legal Opinion

Conduitt v. Ross

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1885No. 11,760PublishedCited by 35 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

On -the 26th day of April, 1875, Julia A. Ross and John Hauck were the owners of adjoining lots in the city of Indianapolis. Pursuant to a written agreement entered into by Mrs. Ross and her husband on the one part, and Mr. Hauck on the other, she placed one-half the width of the south wall of a four-story brick and stone building/ which she erected on her lot, on the north margin of the Hauck lot. After erecting the building, she conveyed the *167lot, with the improvements thereon, to George P. Bissell, reserving by a stipulation contained in her deed, the right to receive compensation from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bronson v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Van Rensselaer v. . HaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Maine v. CumstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  5. Hazlett v. SinclairIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Midland Railway Co. v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Columbia Club, Inc. v. American Fletcher Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Whittenton Manufacturing Co. v. StaplesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  4. Moseley v. BishopIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Scott v. StetlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API