Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Richmond v. County of Henrico

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 13, 1947No. Record No. 3014Published

1ConcurrenceEggleston, J.

I concur in the view expressed in the majority opinion that the appellant, the city of Richmond, should recover its costs on appeal, and that the appellees, Windsor Farms, Incorporated, and Grove Improvement Corporation, should recover their costs in the lower court.

A brief restatement of the underlying facts and prior proceedings will, perhaps, clarify my views on the precise issue now before us.

Some years ago, Windsor Farms, Incorporated, and Grove Improvement Corporation developed certain lands just beyond the limits of the city of Richmond. These companies installed in the streets and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Richmond v. County of HenricoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  2. McLean v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API