Legal Opinion
City of Richmond v. County of Henrico
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided April 22, 1946No. Record No. 3014PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.
The issues involved in this case grow out of the annexation by the city of Richmond of a large territory, of which Windsor Farms and Grove Avenue Crest are a part. For former opinion, see 177 Va. 754, 15 S. E. (2d) 309. These are subdivisions which were developed by Windsor Farms, Inc. and Grove Improvement Corporation, respectively. At the time they were developed, they were within five miles of the city of Richmond, a city of more than 150,000 inhabitants, and therefore they were within the provisions of sections 5222g-5222o of the Code of Virginia of 1942, Acts of 1924, p. 713.
The…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Segaloff v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
- City of Norfolk v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. SmitSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
- Hampton Roads Sanitation District Commission v. City of ChesapeakeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1978
- City of Marietta v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.