Legal Opinion

Castek v. Tully

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1934No. 28980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomsen, District Judge.

In a foreclosure of a mortgage on farm lands, the court appointed Frank W. Shonka, Jr., receiver to manage, rent, and take charge of the lands, except 40 acres on which the house and buildings are located. This latter land was assigned to the exclusive use of the mortgagor. By order of the court the receiver rented the property, of which he had charge, to the defendant Joseph Tully, the mortgagor, and later, without such order, made a lease for a definite term to Anton Mastny, Jr. Later, after the moratorium act, section 20-21,159 et seq., Comp. St. Supp. 1933, became…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. SullivanNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Barkley v. SchaafNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Polk v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Reilly v. MertenNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. KilbourneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clausen v. School District No. 33Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Kansas City Life Insurance v. NeverveNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Cheney v. FinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API