Legal Opinion

City of Louisville v. Benedict

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 6, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Settle —

Affirming.

This action was instituted by Geo. W. Gosnell, contractor, to enforce a lien upon two lots of ground owned by the appellee, Jane Benedict and situated on Hite avenue, in the city of Louisville, in satisfaction of apportionment warrants, one of $377.49, and the other $60.49, exclusive of interest; these amounts representing the cost of constructing Hite avenue, apportioned to and assessed against Mrs. Benedict’s lots, respectively.

The appellant, City of Louisville, was joined with the appellee, Benedict, as a defendant; it being alleged in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. BitzerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Preston v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886
  3. City of Covington v. SouthgateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1854

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawrence E. Furey, Trustee v. City of Sacramento, a Chartered City, County of Sacramento and Natomas Sanitation District of Sacramento CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. City of Covington v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Leslie E. Brooks Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  4. Wells v. WestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. City of Paducah v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API